Sunday, December 30, 2007

End of Suffering: The Investment

If Moloch hides behind the corporate shield, then his end is near. Online trading accounts are available to anyone with $500. The Socialist dream that the people should own the means of production is at hand. We all own a piece of Moloch, or wish we did.

Companies that are in trouble because they have been evil are an attractive investment for a certain kind of person. I once knew a fellow who invested in Phillip Morris just as it was being tagged for knowingly selling addictive substances that destroyed people. I had already stopped smoking by then. He seemed a little strange.

Not everyone feels so obliged. Online investors I know today seem to delight in putting their money into companies that make the world a healthier place - Whole Foods, CostCo, and Apple Computer. Companies that deliver the future we desire.

I have had success this year - a 30% gain - with investments in two companies that relieve suffering. This is my new model - well managed companies that relieve suffering and that also have a history of continuous regular growth. This model allows a "set and forget" style of investing that frees my time.

One company is Gilead Pharmaceuticals, GILD. They make drugs that help cure AIDS and other immune system diseases.

The other is Sunpower, SPWR. They make solar power arrays that capture sunlight and put it on the power grid. Goodbye to coal, carbon dioxide, and global warming. They seem to have a future.

These are the companies that worked for me this year, helping to make my world a better place in more ways than one.

Well managed. Continuous growth. End suffering.

For the poor will always be with us.

Friday, December 28, 2007

Is Genius Self-Limiting?

Genius and effectiveness do not seem to go hand in hand.

A recent study discovered that there is absolutely no correlation between genius and wealth.

Perhaps genius conceives worlds so complex that practical implementation is not worth the expense.

Perhaps genius conceives projects to fit into a world of its own conniving, and failing ever to have taken a hammer to a nail, misses the point.

The farther from the ground, the better the vision. But the harder the fall.

So it appears with Karl Rove, the retired former chief advisor to Mr. Bush, who still occupies the Office of the President. He has written a book. But he almost couldn't sell it to a publisher. Got half of what he wanted.

He visited publisher after publisher with "One of the premier authors' representatives in the world", Washington lawyer Robert Barnett at his side, only to discover that interest was slack.

Two weeks ago, Mr. Rove told the world the amazing news that the run-up to the Iraq war was Congress' fault, not the fault of the White House. Never mind that in the year before the war, the U.S. Air Force took every opportunity to soften the Iraqi air defenses.

Assuming a handle on the valve of history, Mr. Rove has set himself apart from usual realities and appears to have put his work under suspicion as well.

Having warned us in advance that he rewrites history, who will now read his?

He lives in a world of his own conceiving. Such power.

But then, don't we all?

Thursday, December 13, 2007

The Waterboarding President

Washington was chain-sawed this week by the revelation that Jose Rodriguez, retiring director of the CIA's National Clandestine Service, had ordered destroyed two CIA torture tapes. These tapes contained hundreds of hours of interrogation video including the waterboarding of two CIA detainees.

A federal judge had already told them not to do it.

Evidence has now been destroyed. Justice has been obstructed. The Geneva Convention has been broken and the proof destroyed.

Now our troops can be tortured and the world won't give a damn. Hello, recruiters!

Hello, Commander in Chief.

The head of the CIA, Michael Hayden, resplendent and beribboned in his military uniform, something he wore on his previous job and which he apparently loves very much, told the press that the tapes had been destroyed to protect he identity of the torturers so that Al Queda couldn't seek revenge.

Then one of the torturers spoke up, identified himself, and said that it was torture and that he'd never do it again. But that it had been effective.

How effective is anyone's guess, since he didn't remember what was said, only that many plots were revealed. Many, many plots.

He also said that each and every act of waterboarding required approval from the highest authorities. A paper trail was laid.

Meanwhile, our new bedrock conservative Attorney General Mukasey is fumbling around trying to reconcile our torturous acts with the fact that we convicted a Japanese soldier of torture for waterboarding at the end of the Second World War.

Waterboarding is a well-defined act of torture. The world community sees it that way.

Did George Bush sign off on it?

Saturday, December 08, 2007

Shame

The CIA has destroyed tapes of its torture sessions with two detainees.

Why should someone do this?

Shame.

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Holy Crow

It may be a "Joy To The World" Christmas, after all.

A National Intelligence Estimate has been released that tells us that Iran has not had an active military nuclear program since 2003.

Despite their own President's threats to bomb Israel. Despite our identifying the doorways to their vast underground nuclear weapon development complex as targets to be pummelled with large new bombs yet to be invented. Despite Mr. Bush's October warning that failure to interdict the Iranian menace could lead to World War III, words spoken when he knew better.

Must have been something else. They had nothing. Oops. Again.

Our misreading suggests that our intelligence services have not had sources on the ground in Iran, at least not enough of them to allow cross-checking the story of one against the story of another. Perhaps the CIA's having replaced democratically elected Mossadegh with the Shah so many years ago has led modern Iran to keep a sharp watch out for their presence.

Mr. Bush says that nothing has changed, Iran is still a threat. But getting the United Nations to agree on further sanctions against them, including the sanction of war, is unlikely now.

Our fear of Iran has been based on bad intelligence. Our invasion of Iraq was based on bad intelligence. Sorry, everybody. Our bad.

What this means to Vice President Cheney, whose staff has long fought for a war with Iran, is hard to say. Apparently the truth became inescapable.

This means the ultraconservative PNAC dream of leapfrogging from Iraq onward to Iran is ended. Staffers seem to be polishing their resumes as best they can, as they offload to thumb drives the emails that will incriminate their bosses. If needed.

The case of a prisoner who has been held at Guantanamo for more than six years without bail or trial is being heard by the Supreme Court today.

Perhaps they will see the writing on the wall and ask why he is held without process.

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

One Mayor Speaks

Here's what one mayor said about the state of the nation, courtesy of an e-mail from a chain of dear friends...


(Ruth feels strongly about this. D.)


(I thought you would find this interesting!
Love, peace, joy,
Ruth)

(Liam wrote: I was sure that was another urban legend. How could a mayor of a major city take such a firebrand position? So I looked it up .... and it's bona fide!) (http://www.slcgov.com/mayor)


The following is a speech delivered by Salt Lake City Mayor Ross C. "Rocky"
Anderson on October 27, 2007.
Salt Lake City, Utah --

"Today, as we come together once again in this great city, we raise our voices in unison to say to President Bush, to Vice President Cheney, to other members of the Bush Administration (past and present), to a majority of Congress, including Utah's entire congressional delegation, and to much of the mainstream media: "You have failed us miserably and we won't take it any more."

"While we had every reason to expect far more of you, you have been pompous, greedy, cruel, and incompetent as you have led this great nation to a moral, military, and national security abyss."

"You have breached trust with the American people in the most egregious ways. You have utterly failed in the performance of your jobs. You have undermined our Constitution, permitted the violation of the most fundamental treaty obligations, and betrayed the rule of law."

"You have engaged in, or permitted, heinous human rights abuses of the sort never before countenanced in our nation's history as a matter of official policy. You have sent American men and women to kill and be killed on the basis of lies, on the basis of shifting justifications, without competent leadership, and without even a coherent plan for this monumental blunder."

"We are here to tell you: We won't take it any more!"

"You have acted in direct contravention of values that we, as Americans who love our country, hold dear. You have deceived us in the most cynical, outrageous ways. You have undermined, or allowed the undermining of, our constitutional system of checks and balances among the three presumed co-equal branches of government. You have helped lead our nation to the brink of fascism, of a dictatorship contemptuous of our nation's treaty obligations, federal statutory law, our Constitution, and the rule of law."

"Because of you, and because of your jingoistic false 'patriotism,' our world is far more dangerous, our nation is far more despised, and the threat of terrorism is far greater than ever before."

"It has been absolutely astounding how you have committed the most horrendous acts, causing such needless tragedy in the lives of millions of people, yet you wear your so-called religion on your sleeves, asserting your God-is-on-my-side nonsense - when what you have done flies in the face of any religious or humanitarian tradition. Your hypocrisy is mind-boggling - and disgraceful. What part of "Thou shalt not kill" do you not understand? What part of the "Golden rule" do you not understand? What part of "be honest," "be responsible," and "be accountable" don't you understand? What part of "Blessed are the peacekeepers" do you not understand?"

"Because of you, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, many thousands of people have suffered horrendous lifetime injuries, and millions have been run off from their homes. For the sake of our nation, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of our brothers and sisters around the world, we are morally compelled to say, as loudly as we can, 'We won't take it any more!"

"As United States agents kidnap, disappear, and torture human beings around the world, you justify, you deceive, and you cover up. We find what you have done to men, women and children, and to the good name and reputation of the United States, so appalling, so unconscionable, and so outrageous as to compel us to call upon you to step aside and allow other men and women who are competent, true to our nation's values, and with high moral principles to stand in your places - for the good of our nation, for the good of our children, and for the good of our world."

"In the case of the President and Vice President, this means impeachment and removal from office, without any further delay from a complacent, complicit Congress, the Democratic majority of which cares more about political gain in 2008 than it does about the vindication of our Constitution, the rule of law, and democratic accountability."

"It means the election of people as President and Vice President who, unlike most of the presidential candidates from both major parties, have not aided and abetted in the perpetration of the illegal, tragic, devastating invasion and occupation of Iraq. And it means the election of people as President and Vice President who will commit to return our nation to the moral and strategic imperative of refraining from torturing human beings."

"In the case of the majority of Congress, it means electing people who are diligent enough to learn the facts, including reading available National Intelligence Estimates, before voting to go to war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will jealously guard Congress's sole prerogative to declare war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will not submit like vapid lap dogs to presidential requests for blank checks to engage in so-called preemptive wars, for legislation permitting warrantless wiretapping of communications involving US citizens, and for dangerous, irresponsible, saber-rattling legislation like the recent Kyl-Lieberman amendment."

"We must avoid the trap of focusing the blame solely upon President Bush and Vice-President Cheney. This is not just about a few people who have wronged our country - and the world. They were enabled by members of both parties in Congress, they were enabled by the pathetic mainstream news media, and, ultimately, they have been enabled by the American people - 40% of whom are so ill-informed they still think Iraq was behind the 9/11 attacks - a people who know and care more about baseball statistics and which drunken starlets are wearing underwear than they know and care about the atrocities being committed every single day in our name by a government for which we need to take responsibility."

"As loyal Americans, without regard to political partisanship -- as veterans, as teachers, as religious leaders, as working men and women, as students, as professionals, as businesspeople, as public servants, as retirees, as people of all ages, races, ethnic origins, sexual orientations, and faiths -- we are here to say to the Bush administration, to the majority of Congress, and to the mainstream media: "You have violated your solemn responsibilities. You have undermined our democracy, spat upon our Constitution, and engaged in outrageous, despicable acts. You have brought our nation to a point of immorality, inhumanity, and illegality of immense, tragic, unprecedented proportions."

"But we will live up to our responsibilities as citizens, as brothers and sisters of those who have suffered as a result of the imperial bullying of the United States government, and as moral actors who must take a stand: And we will, and must, mean it when we say 'We won't take it any more.'"

"If we want principled, courageous elected officials, we need to be principled, courageous, and tenacious ourselves. History has demonstrated that our elected officials are not the leaders - the leadership has to come from us. If we don't insist, if we don't persist, then we are not living up to our responsibilities as citizens in a democracy - and our responsibilities as moral human beings. If we remain silent, we signal to Congress and the Bush administration - and to candidates running for office - and to the world - that we support the status quo."

"Silence is complicity. Only by standing up for what's right and never letting down can we say we are doing our part."

"Our government, on the basis of a campaign we now know was entirely fraudulent, attacked and militarily occupied a nation that posed no danger to the United States. Our government, acting in our name, has caused immense, unjustified death and destruction."

"It all started five years ago, yet where have we, the American people, been? At this point, we are responsible. We get together once in a while at demonstrations and complain about Bush and Cheney, about Congress, and about the pathetic news media. We point fingers and yell a lot. Then most people politely go away until another demonstration a few months later."

"How many people can honestly say they have spent as much time learning about and opposing the outrages of the Bush administration as they have spent watching sports or mindless television programs during the past five years? Escapist, time-sapping sports and insipid entertainment have indeed become the opiate of the masses."

"Why is this country so sound asleep? Why do we abide what is happening to our nation, to our Constitution, to the cause of peace and international law and order? Why are we not doing all in our power to put an end to this madness?"

"We should be in the streets regularly and students should be raising hell on our campuses. We should be making it clear in every way possible that apologies or convoluted, disingenuous explanations just don't cut it when presidential candidates and so many others voted to authorize George Bush and his neo-con buddies to send American men and women to attack and occupy Iraq."

"Let's awaken, and wake up the country by committing here and now to do all each of us can to take our nation back. Let them hear us across the country, as we ask others to join us: "We won't take it any more!"

"I implore you: Draw a line. Figure out exactly where your own moral breaking point is. How much will you put up with before you say "No more" and mean it?"

"I have drawn my line as a matter of simple personal morality: I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has voted to fund the atrocities in Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who will not commit to remove all US troops, as soon as possible, from Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has supported legislation that takes us one step closer to attacking Iran. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has not fought to stop the kidnapping, disappearances, and torture being carried on in our name."

"If we expect our nation's elected officials to take us seriously, let us send a powerful message they cannot misunderstand. Let them know we really do have our moral breaking point. Let them know we have drawn a bright line. Let them know they cannot take our support for granted - that, regardless of their party and regardless of other political considerations, they will not have our support if they cannot provide, and have not provided, principled leadership."

"The people of this nation may have been far too quiet for five years, but let us pledge that we won't let it go on one more day - that we will do all we can to put an end to the illegalities, the moral degradation, and the disintegration of our nation's reputation in the world."

"Let us be unified in drawing the line - in declaring that we do have a moral breaking point. Let us insist, together, in supporting our troops and in gratitude for the freedoms for which our veterans gave so much, that we bring our troops home from Iraq, that we return our government to a constitutional democracy, and that we commit to honoring the fundamental principles of human rights."

"In defense of our country, in defense of our Constitution, in defense of our shared values as Americans - and as moral human beings - we declare today that we will fight in every way possible to stop the insanity, stop the continued military occupation of Iraq, and stop the moral depravity reflected by the kidnapping, disappearing, and torture of people around the world."

One man's stand. He is not alone.

Monday, December 03, 2007

Huckobamabee World

Have you noticed that the front-runners in Iowa seem to be the least botoxed?

Obama and Huckabee have the most expressive faces, the most heart. Romney and Hillary have placid forheads and perpetual smiles. Romney 's face looks as polished as a hood ornament. (Hood ornaments lead the way!)

It's going to be a Huckobamabee world. Huckabee wants to restore music classes in schools. Thinks kids grow better if they're well-rounded. I'm for that. Obama taught Constitutional Law. I'm for that, too.

Choices.

Sunday, December 02, 2007

We Kidnap

In this morning's Huffington Post we discover that we kidnap. Our government, which we presumably own and for which we are responsible, kidnaps. Huff reports a story in the Times of London:
"A senior lawyer for the American government has told the Court of Appeal in London that kidnapping foreign citizens is permissible under American law because the US Supreme Court has sanctioned it."
If the kidnapping did not occur in the United States, then it did not violate our laws, so said the Court. So it's ok for our government to do it. Even where it's illegal.

Although we have an extradition treaty with Mexico, in 1990 our DEA kidnapped a suspect, Humberto Alvarez Machain, from at his medical office in Guadalajara, Mexico and flew him to Texas for criminal prosecution. This action instantiated a new principle: we can do what we want, regardless of borders.

Our kidnappers, of course, risk being caught in the act and themselves arrested for kidnapping.

Or worse. Being kidnapped at their homes by foreign bounty hunters and returned to the site of the crime for trial. How well our new principle stands up may depend on how big a price is put on the heads of our kidnappers. Will we fly in with helicopters and rescue them? Time for the Rescue Rangers!

Every American kidnapper acquires a value abroad.

In the same issue of the Huffington Post, we learn that acceptance of torture is common in America today. We torture. It's ok. Circumstances, you know.

The world should know that there still are Americans who find torture appalling.

How soon before a bounty is placed on the heads of the American Blackwater contractors who shot their way through traffic in Iraq? How many Iraqis would contribute to such a bounty fund? Would a million dollar reward on each head bring them in for trial?

How many Australians, for that matter, would contribute to such a fund?

That's assuming that we leave Iraq with a legal system. If we fail to do so, since we now consider waterboarding and tasering "normal" pre-court-hearing punishments, how soon will we hear of them being applied to those shooters who in their "normal" course of business have killed the parents of tomorrow's leaders?

The Blackwater shooters will always live in risk of being kidnapped and possibly waterboarded by the survivors of their acts. We have made these into a normal response.

We kidnap.


(Says a British fellow, in the extended comments to the Times article,
"Leave us alone!

There are plenty here who won't touch America with a 10,000 mile bargepole, yet you still hunt us down. Let us carry out our lives in peace, whilst you self combust in your own country!

Howard, Manchester" )